How we know

How a claim climbs.

A claim about what a molecule does has five stages to pass: a dish, an animal, a handful of volunteers, a trial against placebo, and a second group that gets the same answer. Each stage settles one question and leaves the next one open. Of the 10 CBG claims our registry tracks, 9 are on the track and 2 have been tested in people. None has reached the top.

Sources verified·21 studies·updated 9 August 2026·How we check
The track

Five stations, and where each claim stops.

Read left to right on a wide screen, top to bottom on a phone. A station shows what a study of that design can establish, the grade a claim usually holds when its evidence goes no further, and the CBG claims whose best study stops there. The chip is the same one used across the site, and its permitted wording travels with it.

Interactive · walk the track

Press Play to move station by station, or pick one. Every claim below sits where its best study stops. One claim, CBG and sleep, is placed on a published trial still in intake review, and its card says so.

Claims on the track
9
Furthest station reached
4 · Placebo-controlled trial
Claims at the top
none yet

All 5 stations shown.

Receptor assay cells and tissue

What this stage can show

How a molecule behaves at a target: which receptor or enzyme it binds, in which direction, and how strongly, measured in a dish under controlled conditions.

What it cannot

Whether any of that happens in a living body at a dose a person would take. A mechanism is a reason to run the next experiment, not a result in people.

The grade a claim usually holds when its evidence stops here
  • grade: Low“limited evidence · unclear”Limited and low-confidence — sparse, indirect, or single-source data.
  • grade: Hypothesized“proposed mechanism”Proposed and plausible — but not yet shown.
Claims that stop here

Animal model mouse or rat

What this stage can show

Whether the mechanism produces a measurable effect in a whole organism, and at roughly what exposure, under a disease model built to resemble the human condition.

What it cannot

Whether people respond the same way. Doses, metabolism and the model itself all differ, and an effect seen in animals is often not reproduced in people.

The grade a claim usually holds when its evidence stops here
  • grade: Low“limited evidence · unclear”Limited and low-confidence — sparse, indirect, or single-source data.
Claims that stop here

Small human pilot one dose, a few dozen people

What this stage can show

Whether an acute, single-dose exposure is tolerated and whether a signal appears on a self-reported or short-term measure, usually against placebo in healthy volunteers.

What it cannot

Whether the signal survives repeated dosing, a clinical population, or a second group of investigators. One small trial is one observation.

The grade a claim usually holds when its evidence stops here
  • grade: Low“limited evidence · unclear”Limited and low-confidence — sparse, indirect, or single-source data.

Registry ceiling for a claim at this stage: grade: Emerging “may · early evidence suggests” The gap between the chip above and this one is what a second, larger trial would have to close.

The claim that stop here

Placebo-controlled trial randomised, repeated dose

What this stage can show

Whether a pre-declared primary endpoint moves more on the compound than on placebo, in a population that has the condition, over a course of dosing.

What it cannot

Whether the finding is robust. A single trial can be right for the wrong reasons; a null primary endpoint counts against the claim even when other measures look promising.

The grade a claim usually holds when its evidence stops here
  • grade: Not supported“evidence does not support”Tested, and the evidence does NOT support it. This is a finding against the claim — not an absence of evidence.
The claim that stop here
  • Stops at station 4 of 5

    Tested in people against placebo, with a null primary endpoint. The trial is in intake review and has no graded registry entry yet, so it is described on the condition page without a PubMed link.

Independent replication an unaffiliated group

What this stage can show

That the effect is not an artefact of one team, one site or one sponsor. Replicated human data is what the top of the ladder is defined by.

What it cannot

Very little, which is the point. Settled is not the same as complete: dose, duration and who benefits still take further work.

The grade a claim usually holds when its evidence stops here

No claim yet No CBG claim in our registry has evidence that reaches this stage. The ladder reserves its top rung for it: grade: Established Settled science — replicated human data, or biochemistry that is not in dispute.

Claims that stop here

None in our registry. The station is drawn so the distance is visible.

Why the fourth station is hard

A good secondary result does not rescue a missed primary.

Before a controlled trial starts, its investigators name one measure that will decide it. That is the primary endpoint, and it is chosen in advance precisely so the answer cannot be picked after the data are in.

A trial also records other measures, and with enough of them something will usually move. Some of that movement is real; some is chance, and a result found by looking after the fact cannot tell you which. So a secondary measure that improves while the primary stays flat is a reason to design the next trial around it. It is not a result of this one, and the grade does not move on it.

The same logic runs the other way. When the primary endpoint is null, the claim drops to the bottom rung, Not supported, even if the compound was well tolerated and even if the people on it felt better. Feeling better on both arms is what a placebo control exists to separate, and a trial that cannot separate them has answered its question. That is where the CBG and sleep claim sits today. The CBG and anxiety and stress claim, one station earlier, has a positive signal from a single acute dose in healthy volunteers and no repeated-dose trial yet, which is why it holds a low grade with a higher stated ceiling.

Two links for the rest of the picture: the ladder itself, with the words each rung permits, and the gap-map, which lists the questions nobody has tested.

Cardiovascular note

The blood-pressure claim on the track is mechanistic and safety-relevant, not a benefit claim. CBG shows potent α2-adrenoceptor agonism in vitro, and α2 agonists can lower blood pressure — but no study has measured an actual blood-pressure effect of CBG. If you take blood-pressure medication or have a cardiovascular condition, consult a clinician first.

Informational only, not medical advice

Nothing here diagnoses, cures or prevents any condition, and no claim on the track is a recommendation to use CBG for it. Grades reflect the studies we had checked as of 9 August 2026. Report a safety event. Peregrine Biopharma funds the platform and holds no editorial authority.