Research Library

Every verified study.

Every graded claim on CBG Atlas traces back to one of these 21 PubMed-verified publications. Filter them by evidence tier, compound and year, sort by recency or evidence strength, and follow any study straight to its DOI and PubMed record. New: Fabro et al. 2026, on muscle, published 30 September 2026 and waiting for PubMed before it can be graded.

New publicationACS Pharmacology & Translational Science · Vol 9 · Issue 10 · pp 2772–2782 ·

CBG and muscle

Cannabigerol Enhances Muscle Strength and Performance in Dexamethasone-Treated Mice

Izabel Feltrin Fabro, Tatyana Nery, Ana Paula Pinto de Araújo and 3 more · open access, CC BY 4.0

study type: Animal · preclinicalNot yet graded
What they tested
Mice with muscle wasting caused by a steroid medicine (dexamethasone) did four weeks of resistance training, climbing a ladder with weights, with CBG or without it. Sedentary groups, with and without CBG, served as controls.
What the authors report
  • Mice given CBG while training generated more muscle power than mice that trained alone: about 55% more in the first week and 87% more by the fourth.
  • CBG-treated mice also gripped about 10% harder, whether they trained or not.
  • Muscle-fibre size changed only modestly, so the gain was in what the muscle could do more than in how big it grew.
What it cannot tell you
This is one study, in male mice, with steroid-induced wasting rather than ageing or weight loss. Outcomes were not assessed blind, and how CBG might do this was not tested. It does not show that CBG builds or protects muscle in people; that takes human trials of CBG itself. The authors do cite a human trial on muscle soreness after exercise, but it tested a multi-ingredient formulation containing CBG, so it cannot say what CBG alone does.

Declared interests. One author is a partner in a medical-cannabis company, Remederi, declared in the paper. The work was funded by Brazilian public research agencies (CAPES, FAPESC, CNPq).

The evidence

Browse the verified registry.

Each study has been verified against PubMed and graded by study type. Inclusion means the paper checked out against PubMed and was graded by design; it does not mean the study shows a benefit.

Evidence
Compound

No registry study yet for CBGV, CBC, CBN or CBDV. Their pages say what is known from elsewhere.

Years
Showing 21 of 21 studies
Coverage

A monograph for every compound

What the registry holds for each compound we publish a page on, and where the human data sits. A count is a coverage fact, not a grade.

CompoundFormulaStudies in our registryHuman dataPage
Cannabigerol (CBG)C21H32O221In our registryOpen the page →
Cannabigerolic acid (CBGa)C22H32O44None in our registryOpen the page →
Cannabigerovarin (CBGV)C19H28O20None in our registryOpen the page →
Cannabichromene (CBC)C21H30O20None in our registryOpen the page →
Cannabinol (CBN)C21H26O20External onlyOpen the page →
Cannabidivarin (CBDV)C19H26O20External onlyOpen the page →
Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV)C19H26O21External onlyOpen the page →

A human trial in our registry links CBG. For CBN, CBDV, THCV the compound page documents human trials our registry has not yet graded; they are cited in prose there and count for nothing here. A zero is a catalogue in progress, not a finding against the compound.

At a glance

Thirty years of CBG research, in one picture.

Plot every study in the registry by year and by design, and the first thing you notice is how few dots there are. The whole evidence base fits in one picture. That scarcity keeps every claim on the site short of settled.

The registry · at a glance
Thirty years of evidence, and one human trial in this registry
The registry holds 21 verified studies published between 1996 and 2026. 1 human trial, 8 animal, 6 in vitro, 4 biochemistry, 2 review. The vertical axis is study DESIGN, not evidence grade: it describes how each study was run, not the standing of any claim. Only one study in this registry tested CBG in people — Cuttler 2024 — and the rest is laboratory, animal, biochemical or review work. The picture is deliberately unflattering: this is a small, recent and largely preclinical evidence base, and that is why claims on this platform are hedged.19962000201020202026Human trial1Animal8In vitro6Biochemistry4Review2Cuttler · 2024Borrelli · 2013Borrelli · 2014Valdeolivas · 2015Brierley · 2016Farha · 2020Zhou · 2022Mendiguren · 2023Mabou Tagne · 2026Russo · 2005Appendino · 2008Cascio · 2010De Petrocellis · 2011Laprairie · 2015Gugliandolo · 2018Taura · 1996Sirikantaramas · 2004Wang · 2016Zirpel · 2018Pertwee · 2008Nachnani · 2021Cuttler 2024 — the registry’s human trial
  1. Human trial12024
  2. Animal82013–2026
  3. In vitro62005–2018
  4. Biochemistry41996–2018
  5. Review22008–2021
Human trial
a study that tested CBG in people
Other designs
animal, in vitro, biochemistry or review work
Each dot
one registry study; select it to open its card below

Study design, not evidence grade. The rows describe how each study was run — a trial, an animal model, a dish — and say nothing about the standing of any claim. On this platform a tier describes a study; a grade describes a claim. Nothing in this figure is graded.

Open data

Download the registry.

Take the registry with you. The snapshot comes in two forms, a typeset PDF to read and cite and machine-readable JSON to check against the registry fingerprint. Both come from the export the site itself reads, so the two always agree.

PDF · JSON

Evidence registry: full export

cbg-atlas-evidence · 21 verified studies · generated 2026-08-09

Every verified study with its evidence tier, first author, year, journal, DOI, PubMed record, topics and per-study provenance hash. The PDF groups studies by design, strongest first, and prints the registry hash on every page.

PDF · JSON

Gap-map: coverage by condition

gap-map · the unknowns, condition by condition

Every tracked condition with its evidence status, its grade where one exists, and what is missing before that grade could move. Conditions with no primary evidence stay in the file too. Read the gap-map.

Licence & provenance

Licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0; attribute as “CBG Atlas. Funded by Peregrine Biopharma, which holds no editorial authority.”. All four files come from one publish, and the PDFs add nothing the JSON lacks. The evidence export carries the registry fingerprint 154671f50c4acbb13f602b479f4fddeb6e455779db35c7e643b7a595e2173e3a (SHA-256, generated 2026-08-09), so you can prove exactly which snapshot you hold. The gap-map is built from the same registry and records its own build date in the file.

Its limits. The registry is a curated set of PubMed-verified, non-retracted primary sources. It is not a systematic review or a complete census of the literature, so a study's absence from the file marks a gap in our catalogue rather than a verdict, and nothing in the file establishes clinical benefit in humans.